County denies Highland tree-clearing bid

To an unusual round of applause from the gallery, county council last week upheld a Museum Committee decision to deny Highland Companies’ request to clear a 2.4-hectare woodlot.

The council voted unanimously to adopt the committee minutes without discussing it further, a move that obviously met with the approval of residents in the area of the woodlot and of North Dufferin Agricultural and Community Taskforce (NDACT).

At committee, Highland spokesman Michael Daniher had said the minor exemption requested was for the purpose of increasing farm acreage, part of a “tree management program” to make their farm operations more profitable. His statement reflected a letter to the committee and council from Bruce Wilson, manager of Highland’s farm operations.

However, at least seven residents had urged the committee to uphold a staff report recommending denial of the request on a variety of grounds.

In particular, Jill Katenburg said she had researched devastating environmental effects of settlers’ tree removal in the 19th century. The clearing of trees had, according to her research, led to blow-sands and soil erosion that had resulted in entire fences being covered and roadways rendered impassable in some instances.

Rick Wallace, an abutting landowner, described the topography of the area and said removal of the woodlot would increase soil erosion and have a negative impact on his property.

Two residents at the committee had stated or implied disbelief that the tree removal was for farming.

Karren Wallace, who told councillors that she is not a member of NDACT, said the woodlot is in the area proposed for mining of limestone, and added that seven acres would make little difference to a 7,500-acre farming operation.

Resident Wayne Hannan also questioned whether the tree removal was planned for farming.

Outside county council last Thursday, Mr. Daniher said he continues to believe the Highland application was reasonable.

He said he had asked council to delay its decision until there was an opportunity to discuss conditions for possible approval, as suggested by Melancthon council.

“It decided otherwise, and we will carry on. We will continue to manage our property, including trees, in what we believe to be an appropriate and responsible way,” he said.